WHAT HAPPENED?
I have finally gotten around to reading Tom
Brokaw’s book, The Greatest Generation.
He writes lots of things I relate to, as he could easily have included
my parents for a chapter in the book. In
many ways, he did, not by name but in terms of the kind of people they
were.
In his book, Brokaw highlights such
characteristics as honesty, loyalty, humility, endurance, the ability to face
hardship and deprivation, dedication, faith, the importance of family and the
commitment they demonstrated as they kept lifelong marriage vows. These were the characteristics instilled
through the hardships of the Great Depression, of hard physical labor, and of the
crisis of a world at war. I know
personally a number of individuals from that generation whose marriages lasted
50 or 60 years or more! Brokaw addresses
this theme time and again, stating that this generation just seemed to take the
vows more seriously back then, and did not consider divorce an option.
As I have encountered these friends of mine
with their long term marriages, I have often wondered how many people from my
generation will ever see their 50th anniversary.
So many divorces.
Brokaw sees it as a major symptom of changing
times, one that is tragic in many ways.
Many in my generation had the blessing of growing up in a stable home
with married parents who stayed together throughout their lives. It is a sad thing that so many children in
this day and age will never know what that is like…including my own. Studies indicate that it really does make
a difference.
At the same time, I would like to raise some
thoughts of my own, as kind of response to the ideas raised by Mr. Brokaw, with
no slight intended on his observations about that “greatest generation”.
One of the shifts that I believe has taken
place is in the realm of expectations.
While courtship and romance are as popular today as they were back then,
the expectations of what married life would be like appears to be
different. Brokaw points out time and
again how many of that older generation expected that marriage would take
work, and that difficulties, including marital difficulties, were just part of
life that had to be faced and conquered.
They didn’t expect to have the perfect marriage. Instead, they expected to build
a great marriage.
They also didn’t expect to start out with
everything in place, but to work their way up.
Dad and I used to take a lot of wedding pictures, and he often commented
that newlyweds these days moved into homes that his generation worked their way up into, rather than starting out
there. Brokaw illustrates this through
comparing the 1000 sq. ft. homes of that generation versus the 2000+ sq.ft.
homes of the 90’s. Another interesting
shift I noted was that while Brokaw highlighted individuals who followed
careers for their entire lives, in this day and age instead, it has been
estimated that high school graduates today will experience something like 5
major career shifts by the time they retire, and most of those careers do not
even exist yet. These are all
significant shifts. And then there has
been that fundamental shift from the fact that back in those days, the bulk of
the marriages occurred before they had children and before
the couple took up residence together.
It is a different world…and not necessarily better!
There are lots of things that have changed
over the years, and the size of starter homes is only one. Brokaw points out the advances against the
racism and sexism which were the norms of society in those days. But, it seems to me, as Mr. Brokaw focuses on
the “ease” with which divorces are obtained these days, he fails to recognize
that the change in the divorce rate may well be more than just a lack of follow
through on commitment. An argument could
reasonably be made that the hike in the divorce rate is also a symptom of the
stresses in a radically changing society.
In addition, in my opinion it is also is a symptom of changing
expectations.
For the last few decades, the gender roles in
marriage have been shifting. The fact
that more wives are in the work force, sometimes earning more than husbands,
and husbands are more involved in the raising of children serve as two simple
examples. I believe the expectations of
what to expect a marriage relationship to be like may have shifted as well,
with young couples believing, as with the house, that their relationship should
start out with a depth they may have seen in that of their parents, without
recognizing that their parents’ relationship was the fruit of decades of hard
work and committed love. When they
experience hardship, frustration and disappointment instead, it is interpreted
as failure rather than as a challenge.
And now, with the next generation moving to
adulthood and marriage, having seen so many parents split up, perhaps even
their own, for many of them, the example people like me grew up with is now
lost. Many of this next generation
assume single parent homes, step families and divorce is the norm. Or, conversely, having observed or
experienced the brokenness of a divorcing home, they may be building a
relationship of reaction against being like their parents, rather than
intentionally building their own unique relationship.
Permit me to turn a different direction, and add
one comment that is counter to the image of these wonderful marriages from days
of yore. Much as lifting the cover of
those times reveals the racism and sexism of the day, it is also a fact that
there were many couples who stayed together in spite of an awful marriage,
filled with abuse and adultery. One of
the things that has resulted as women entered the workforce, as well as the
social programs that provide assistance to the impoverished, is that women,
particularly, have the option of choosing to NOT stay in a bad or dangerous
marriage. While this may have
contributed to the divorce rate, it may not be such a bad thing, as it faces
the fact that some marriages are not godly marriages at all, but a sham of
abusive relationships.
Better than divorce for even those abusive
marriages, of course, would be for the couple to agree to face their problems
head on, and do whatever it takes to make the changes necessary to build a
better marriage, as many in the “greatest generation” surely did. But when one partner is unwilling to do that
work, the remaining partner faces the choice of whether to stay and endure, to
stay, pray and work for gradual change, or to file for divorce and finally
acknowledge that the unhealthy situation is dangerous, ungodly and
abusive. Had the men and women of this “greatest
generation” also had the same kind of option to choose, and some I have known
would have appreciated feeling like they had a choice, then perhaps the “greatest
generation” story might have been different.
No comments:
Post a Comment